Skip to main content
Todas as notícias
AI RADARModelos
1•11/11/2026, 10:33•4 min de leitura

GPT Image 2.6 vs. Seedream 5.5: teste de geração de fotos

GPT Image 2.6 vs. Seedream 5.5: teste de geração de fotos - 1
GPT Image 2.6 vs. Seedream 5.5: teste de geração de fotos - 2
Resumo executivo30 seg

GPT Image 2.6 e Seedream 5.5 foram comparados em uma foto realista no elevador: o modelo chinês imita melhor a selfie de iPhone, mas ainda tem problemas de detalhes.

GPT Image 2.6 vs. Seedream 5.5: teste de geração de fotos

O GPT Image 2.6 pulou o sexto andar, enquanto o Seedream 5.5 não lidou bem com os botões. Ao imitar fotos de iPhone, o modelo chinês parece claramente melhor, mas em uma perna volta a mostrar os clássicos seis dedos.

Uma imagem no Seedream 5.5 custa apenas um centavo, e o modelo está disponível via Syntx AI. Se evitar fontes e tipografia, gosto mais do resultado. O ChatGPT imita a foto como se tivesse sido feita com um iPhone muito antigo e com outros algoritmos de processamento.

À esquerda — Image 2.6, à direita — Seedream.

O prompt foi idêntico:

TEXT
Create this image with maximum photographic accuracy.
Scene: A casual full-body mirror selfie inside a modern, dimly lit elevator. Dark navy geometric patterned wall panels on the left, warm brown wood-paneled walls on the right, black reflective elevator doors in the center, illuminated elevator buttons, horizontal silver handrails, and a light gray tiled floor.
Subject: A young woman with straight, shoulder-length dark brown hair parted in the middle, natural facial features, and minimal makeup. She is standing slightly angled toward the mirror, holding a black iPhone with a transparent protective case high above her head with her right arm fully extended. Her phone is positioned in the upper-left corner of the composition. She looks slightly downward at the mirror with puffed cheeks and a playful, serious expression. Her left arm hangs naturally beside her body.
Outfit: A fitted dark charcoal-gray short-sleeve athletic jersey with white side stripes, white sports logos and lettering across the chest, loose oversized gray pinstriped pajama-style pants, and simple black flip-flops. A thin black hair tie around her raised wrist.
Composition: Vertical 9:16 smartphone photo, full-body framing from a slightly elevated mirror-selfie perspective. Subject positioned slightly left of center, raised arm creating a strong diagonal, legs relaxed and slightly apart. Preserve the exact pose, body proportions, camera angle, perspective, outfit, background layout, and framing of the reference.
Photography: Authentic unedited iPhone mirror selfie. Warm overhead elevator lighting mixed with cool ambient reflections, slightly underexposed shadows, realistic skin texture, subtle smartphone grain, natural reflections, imperfect sharpness, and ordinary indoor white balance.
CRITICAL: The result must look like a real spontaneous smartphone snapshot, NOT an AI-generated photograph. No cinematic lighting, no professional photography, no beauty filters, no skin smoothing, no HDR, no artificial sharpness, no color grading, no stylization. Preserve the original reference's realistic colors, exposure, shadows, visual imperfections, and casual everyday aesthetic.

Por que isso importa

Análise

A comparação mostra que modelos de IA mais baratos para geração de imagens podem parecer mais realistas em fotos do cotidiano, mas ainda falham em detalhes pequenos e tipografia.

Debater na comunidade

Compartilhe suas dúvidas e insights com desenvolvedores

Entrar no Telegram
+5 Points
← Voltar ao feed de notícias

Relacionado no ecossistema

Guias práticos, terminologia essencial e skills de agentes