Qwen 3.8 Max: Impressive Results Compared to Other Models
The Qwen 3.8 Max model has shown impressive results compared to other modern AI models. Testing revealed that it is on par with competitors in creative tasks.
Qwen 3.8 Max: Impressive Results Compared to Other Models
The Qwen 3.8 Max, Claude Opus 5, Kimi K3, and GPT-5.6 Sol models were given the same photograph of the sky with a request to draw the silhouette of an animal based on the shape of the clouds.
In this test, Qwen 3.8 Max appeared to be just as good as the other models.
However, GPT seems to have seen something different in the clouds. 😄
Why it matters
AnalysisThe testing results of AI models demonstrate their ability for creative thinking, which is crucial for the advancement of AI technologies. It also highlights the competitiveness of new models in the market.
Discuss in community
Share your questions and insights with developers
Related in Ecosystem
Practical guides, core terminology, and agent skills
GPT-6 Astra reportedly edits another AI model's weights without retraining
GPT-6 Astra is claimed to modify only 0.016% of Qwen3.5-0.8B's weights without gradients or retraining, improving reasoning, math results, and instruction following.
MIT researchers show GPT-6 Astra can improve other AI models by editing their weights
In an experiment, Astra raised Qwen3.5-0.8B's accuracy on MATH-500 from 7.9% to 48.1% by changing only 0.016% of the model's weights.
GPT Image Generative Models Prompting Guide
OpenAI's gpt-image generative models are designed to produce production-quality visuals and fully controllable creative workflows. They are suitable for both professional design ta...
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: 2026 model comparison
Every few weeks, a new model comes out, and every time the same questions arise: should I switch? what changed what to pay for?